|
|
|
clone(s) in cart (order)
|
home | forum | contact | help | ||||||
|
|||||||||
| log in | |||||||||
About the overgo plating process
This page explains (briefly) the nature of the Overgo Plating experiments
conducted at SGN. We also explain the terminology used on our
Overgo statistics page in relation to the
various stages of processing we have conducted.
Overgo plates have 96 wells, arranged in 8 rows by 12 columns. DNA sequence for one overgo probe (a sequenced marker from our maps collection) is assigned to each well. Wells are then pooled using the Soop program to produce 20 pools. (Equivalent to 8 row-pools + 12 column-pools.) BAC plates are then run against these 20 pools for each plate to determine which BACs match a given pool. From this, the matches of BACs to probes can be inferred. A probe which successfully matches one or more BACs is said to "anchor" them to the Genetic Map and is thus referred to as an "anchor point". To successfully anchor to a given probe, we require a BAC to:
In the case where BACs matched more than one row and one column on a given plate, we classify them as being ambiguous BACs. These are stored separately and are not shown on our physical map.
Meanwhile, working from the other end, our collaborators at the
Arizona Genomics Institute are using Fingerprint
Contigging (FPC) techniques to assemble the BAC collection into contigs.
The BAC <--> map position matches generated by our overgo plating experiment
are used to inform the FPC process and improve the contigging conducted there.
After establishing the unambiguous BAC <--> probe associations, a further stage of in silico processing was done to check for the plausibility of BAC matches. Our initial "plausible set" contains all unambiguously anchored BACs. We then remove BACs from this set which fail to meet certain criteria. In general, we expect a given BAC to only match up to a portion of one chromosome. Thus, as a first step, we drop from our plausible set all BACs which are anchored to markers on two or more chromosomes. [N.B. - Once data from all plates are in, it is our intention to conduct more complex analysis. Specifically, if a BAC has multiple anchor points within a tight range on one chromosome and only a lone anchor point elsewhere then we may reasonably conclude that that one match is the aberrancy. However, at this stage the depth of data necessary to drive this analysis has not been accumulated.] Secondly, we expect BACs to be anchored largely to one portion of a chromosome, rather than randomly anchored down its length. Thus we require a plausible BAC to have a "walk" of anchor points, all of which are within a reasonable distance of one another. Arbitrarily, we have chosen a distance of 5.0 cM as the maximum distance between any adjacent anchor points for a given BAC. BACs which are in violation of this principle are dropped from our plausible set. Finally, we consider BAC contigs (as generated using FPC) to be plausible if:
This section gives a summary of the terms used on the Overgo Plating Statistics page. To view the numbers for any of the following, please refer to that page. Terms are listed here in alphabetical order.
| ||||||||||||